Fidex Wallet
A multi-chain crypto wallet where a single failure loses somebody's money. This is the standard we stabilise to
Somebody else started your app. We can finish it.
The developer stopped replying. The app has been “90% done” since March. It crashes and nobody can say why. We audit what you actually own, put the truth in writing, and then fix it. If the honest answer is that you should start again, the report says that instead.
Live app down right now? Say so in the form. We answer emergency triage the same day.
Projects go wrong. The agency stopped replying. The freelancer vanished. The app crashes and nobody can find the cause. The store keeps rejecting it. You have paid for six months and there is still nothing live. We pick these up. The first thing we do is not code, it is tell you the truth about what you actually have.
Who reads your code

I read the code myself before anyone on my team writes you a report. Seven years and 52 apps means I have seen most of the ways a project goes wrong, and almost none of them are the client’s fault.
I will give you the honest answer even when it costs me the job. If your app can be saved, I will say so and give you the number. If it cannot, I will say that too, and you can take my report to anyone you like. I would rather lose a rescue than sell you one you did not need.
The audit
Before anyone talks about fixing anything, you need to know what you have. That is a separate, paid, fixed-price piece of work with a fixed deliverable, Fee needed, delivered in 5 working days for a standard app.
We charge for the audit on purpose. A free review is a sales call with a document attached. When you pay for the audit you are our client for that work, and our only job is to be right. If you go on to work with us, the audit fee comes off the first invoice in full.
What is in the report:
| What is in the report |
|---|
| What is actually built, against what you were told was built |
| Architecture, code quality, security: in plain language, with the technical detail in an appendix |
| Where the crashes come from, with the evidence |
| What is salvageable and what is not |
| Whether finishing is cheaper than restarting, and by how much |
| A cost and a timeline for each road |
| Whether you have everything you need: source, accounts, keys, store access |
| What the current Apple and Google rules mean for your specific app |
Sample report: Sample report needed
| Question | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Does it build and run today, even badly? | Good sign | Serious, not fatal |
| Do you have the repository, or only a shipped app? | Good sign | Harder. We can still work from a shipped build |
| Does one developer know their way around it? | Good sign | Slower, still doable |
| Did it work before and stop, or has it never worked? | Never worked is harder | |
| Is your data model roughly right, even if the screens are wrong? | Good sign | The expensive case |
| Is anything in it costing you money or users today? | Then start with triage, not the audit |
Three or more on the left and a rescue is usually the cheaper road. That is a rule of thumb, not a verdict. The report is the verdict.
Keep or rebuild
We will not tell you to start again just because starting again is easier for us.
Every developer who opens somebody else’s code wants to delete it. This is such a well-known reflex that it was written about twenty-six years ago: “Programmers are, in their hearts, architects, and the first thing they want to do when they get to a site is to bulldoze the place flat and build something grand.” (Joel Spolsky, 2000)
We know we have that bias, so we take the decision out of our hands. Before we open your repository, we send you the questions we will use to decide. The recommendation has to follow from those questions, not from how the code makes us feel.
| We keep and finish it when | We recommend a rebuild when |
|---|---|
| It builds and runs today, even badly | It does not build at all and nobody has the missing pieces |
| The data model is sound, even if the screens are not | The framework or platform version is past the point of upgrading |
| The crashes are in a few places, not everywhere | Fixing one thing reliably breaks two others |
| A competent developer can find their way around it in a day | The cost to finish passes the cost to redo |
Your report shows which of these we hit, on which files, with the evidence. If we say rebuild, hand our report to any other developer for a second opinion. That is what it is for.
An abandoned app does not just get old. It gets removed. These dates are Apple’s and Google’s, not ours.
| Date | What happens | Who it hits |
|---|---|---|
| Since 28 Apr 2026 | Every new App Store upload must be built with Xcode 26 and the iOS 26 SDK | Any iOS app that has not shipped since then. Your next update is a full toolchain jump, not a small fix |
| 31 Aug 2026 | Google Play requires target API level 36 (Android 16) for updates. Extension possible to 1 Nov 2026 | Apps below API 36 stop being visible or installable to new users on newer Android phones |
| 11 Sep 2026 | EU Cyber Resilience Act: actively exploited vulnerabilities must be reported within 24 hours | Any app distributed in the EU |
| 30 Sep 2026 | Google Play developer verification enforced in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand | Unverified developer accounts risk removal from Google Play |
| Ongoing | Apple removes apps with no update for 3 years and few downloads, after a 90-day notice. An app that crashes on launch is removed immediately. No notice, no grace period | Every dormant app |
| 11 Dec 2027 | Full EU Cyber Resilience Act obligations: security by design, CE marking, a declared support period | Any app sold in the EU |
Checked 10 August 2026. Sources: Apple upcoming requirements · App Store Improvements · Google Play target API · Android developer verification · EU Cyber Resilience Act
If your app is sitting still, one of these rows is already your problem. The audit tells you which one, and what it costs to clear it.
We are seeing this weekly now: an app that got 70% of the way there fast, then stopped dead. The screens look right. The code underneath repeats itself, has no structure anyone can follow, and breaks in a new place every time it is touched.
This is measurable, not an opinion:
Across 623 million code changes, the share of changed lines that were refactoring (cleaning up, removing duplication) fell from 21% in 2022 to 3.8% in 2026, while duplicated blocks rose 81% (GitClear)
In a survey of about 49,000 developers, the top frustration with AI tools was code that is “almost right, but not quite”: 66%, and 45.2% said debugging AI-generated code takes them longer than writing it themselves (Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025)
We use AI coding agents every day. That is exactly why we are good at cleaning up after them. We know what they get right, where they cut corners, and which parts have to be rewritten by a person before anything else can be built on top. AI builds fast; a human still has to decide what is worth keeping.
| Industry | What we have rescued or built here | Proof |
|---|---|---|
| Fintech & Banking | Wallets, payments, lending, KYC, crypto | Fidex Wallet · Quickchain · Hindustan Loan |
| Legal-Tech | Case management, court data, auctions, document work | DigitsLaw · ActivePass · Gavel Auctions |
| Retail, POS & E-commerce | Billing, inventory, invoicing, small-business POS | Vencru POS |
| CRM, HR & Internal tools | Sales, staff and workflow apps | PM Fund Manager · FMSoft CRM |
| Energy & Utilities | Solar, metering, field service and monitoring | Tata Power SolaRoof |
| Events, Media & Community | Event, publishing and community apps | Virtue Insight · Azad Sandesh |
| Healthcare & Wellness | We take this work on, but we do not yet have a published case study in it | No claim made |
Before the process
An audit is a reading job before it is a coding job. We open the repo, the store listings, the analytics and the invoices, and we write down what is really there. Only then does the plan below mean anything.
How we work
| # | Step | What happens | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tell us what happened | A 20-minute call. No code needed yet. We just need the story and what you have | Same day for a live app that is down; otherwise within 1 working day |
| 2 | Access and paperwork | NDA signed, read-only access to whatever exists. If you have nothing, we start by recovering what we can | 1 day |
| 3 | We send you the keep-or-rebuild questions | Before we open anything, so you can hold us to them | Day 1 |
| 4 | We read the code | Architecture, quality, security, crash sources, build and release, store readiness | 2-4 days |
| 5 | Report and walkthrough call | The document first, then an hour on a call going through it | Day 5 |
| 6 | You decide | Continue with us, take the report elsewhere, or stop. All three are fine | Your time |
| 7 | Stabilise | Crashes, security holes, a build and release that works reliably. Stability before features, always | Scoped from the report |
| 8 | Finish and ship | Complete what is missing, pass store review, launch. Then maintenance or a new build with us | Scoped from the report |
| Model | Best for | How it is priced |
|---|---|---|
| Audit only | You need to know what you have, and a number you can plan around | Fixed fee, fixed 5 days. Fee needed. Comes off the first invoice in full if you continue |
| Emergency triage | The app is live and actively broken. Stop the bleeding first, understand it after | Hourly, same-day start |
| Audit then fix | The usual road. Audit, then a fixed scope built from what it found | Fixed scope and price, agreed after the report |
| Take it over completely | You want it off your desk: finished, shipped and looked after | Monthly. Rolls into Maintenance & Optimization once it is stable |
No minimum contract size. We have taken single-crash jobs and multi-year builds, and we judge each one on whether we can do it well.
How you get a quote: tell us what happened. Twenty minutes on a call and we will tell you which of the four above you need, including if the answer is that you do not need us at all.
Anand helped us resolve issues related to crash of android version. He quickly picked up the code and resolve the issue in no time.
Pleasure to work with, was able to diagnose the issues with the Flutter mobile app. Great communication and punctual.
Anand is highly technical person, he has resolved our apps issues on time and made the apps lives on google play and apple app store.
A short call, an honest answer on whether we are the right team, and a scope you can hold us to.
Start a project